Bitcoin (BTC) Real-Time Price Index and Chart — CoinDesk 20

Let us take a moment to appreciate the content of this sub-reddit, that we mostly don't have price talk here, but constant technological innovations built on-top of the true Bitcoin (SV), even the delisting got handled very elegant, without too much fuss.

These are the reasons what make me confident in Bitcoin (SV)'s future, as we all have the same goal of creating a currency which can be easily used by everyone without too much restrictions, and with a built-in corruption deterrent in form of full transparency.
The right tools for a bright future for all of us.
Makes me proud to be part of this community, in it's rooting state under constant attack by opposing forces fearing the potential of BSV.
submitted by Vinator to bitcoincashSV [link] [comments]

Original Content - 6 months of Bitcoin Price vs. Greed/Fear Index Data

Original Content - 6 months of Bitcoin Price vs. Greed/Fear Index Data submitted by nitslitinit to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Bitcoin technology magazine with no price speculation or clickbait content

Hi All,
I have been working restlessly in the lasts months to put together http://bitcointechweekly.com, a news site focused solely on Bitcoin technology. It is dedicated mainly to developers and technical people and does not include any price or speculation related content nor click-bait titles.
I started diving into bitcoin technology last year and I missed having a news source that would give me in glimpse all updates on Bitcoin technology without having to scroll through tons of click bait content and price speculation. Before starting this project there was no such source of news as the vast majority of good quality tech articles are posted on personal blogs and the most popular crypto blogs and magazines focus mainly on price talk, advertising and poor or sometimes erroneous information.
Soon I plan to implement subscriptions with LN payments to support the platform without ads.
I thought it was relevant to share here and would appreciate any feedback. I am also looking for contributors who are used to read the dev mailing lists and are interested to write technical essays or brief weekly content.
submitted by use_your_imagination to BitcoinDiscussion [link] [comments]

MicroStrategy Founder: We acquired 21,454 BTC via 78,388 off-chain transactions, then secured it in cold storage with 18 on-chain transactions. #Bitcoin scales just fine as a store of value.

MicroStrategy Founder: We acquired 21,454 BTC via 78,388 off-chain transactions, then secured it in cold storage with 18 on-chain transactions. #Bitcoin scales just fine as a store of value. submitted by myquidproquo to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Price Content

Bitcoin Price Content submitted by ogrewatchmeme to Patrig [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Price Content

Bitcoin Price Content submitted by DanWithWingz to Patrig [link] [comments]

Let us take a moment to appreciate the content of this sub-reddit, that we mostly don't have price talk here, but constant technological innovations built on-top of the true Bitcoin (SV), even the delisting got handled very elegant, without too much fuss. /r/bitcoincashSV

Let us take a moment to appreciate the content of this sub-reddit, that we mostly don't have price talk here, but constant technological innovations built on-top of the true Bitcoin (SV), even the delisting got handled very elegant, without too much fuss. /bitcoincashSV submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Putting $400M of Bitcoin on your company balance sheet

Also posted on my blog as usual. Read it there if you can, there are footnotes and inlined plots.
A couple of months ago, MicroStrategy (MSTR) had a spare $400M of cash which it decided to shift to Bitcoin (BTC).
Today we'll discuss in excrutiating detail why this is not a good idea.
When a company has a pile of spare money it doesn't know what to do with, it'll normally do buybacks or start paying dividends. That gives the money back to the shareholders, and from an economic perspective the money can get better invested in other more promising companies. If you have a huge pile of of cash, you probably should be doing other things than leave it in a bank account to gather dust.
However, this statement from MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor exists to make it clear he's buying into BTC for all the wrong reasons:
“This is not a speculation, nor is it a hedge. This was a deliberate corporate strategy to adopt a bitcoin standard.”
Let's unpack it and jump into the economics Bitcoin:

Is Bitcoin money?

No.
Or rather BTC doesn't act as money and there's no serious future path for BTC to become a form of money. Let's go back to basics. There are 3 main economic problems money solves:
1. Medium of Exchange. Before money we had to barter, which led to the double coincidence of wants problem. When everyone accepts the same money you can buy something from someone even if they don't like the stuff you own.
As a medium of exchange, BTC is not good. There are significant transaction fees and transaction waiting times built-in to BTC and these worsen the more popular BTC get.
You can test BTC's usefulness as a medium of exchange for yourself right now: try to order a pizza or to buy a random item with BTC. How many additional hurdles do you have to go through? How many fewer options do you have than if you used a regular currency? How much overhead (time, fees) is there?
2. Unit of Account. A unit of account is what you compare the value of objects against. We denominate BTC in terms of how many USD they're worth, so BTC is a unit of account presently. We can say it's because of lack of adoption, but really it's also because the market value of BTC is so volatile.
If I buy a $1000 table today or in 2017, it's roughly a $1000 table. We can't say that a 0.4BTC table was a 0.4BTC table in 2017. We'll expand on this in the next point:
3. Store of Value. When you create economic value, you don't want to be forced to use up the value you created right away.
For instance, if I fix your washing machine and you pay me in avocados, I'd be annoyed. I'd have to consume my payment before it becomes brown, squishy and disgusting. Avocado fruit is not good money because avocadoes loses value very fast.
On the other hand, well-run currencies like the USD, GBP, CAD, EUR, etc. all lose their value at a low and most importantly fairly predictible rate. Let's look at the chart of the USD against BTC
While the dollar loses value at a predictible rate, BTC is all over the place, which is bad.
One important use money is to write loan contracts. Loans are great. They let people spend now against their future potential earnings, so they can buy houses or start businesses without first saving up for a decade. Loans are good for the economy.
If you want to sign something that says "I owe you this much for that much time" then you need to be able to roughly predict the value of the debt in at the point in time where it's due.
Otherwise you'll have a hard time pricing the risk of the loan effectively. This means that you need to charge higher interests. The risk of making a loan in BTC needs to be priced into the interest of a BTC-denominated loan, which means much higher interest rates. High interests on loans are bad, because buying houses and starting businesses are good things.

BTC has a fixed supply, so these problems are built in

Some people think that going back to a standard where our money was denominated by a stock of gold (the Gold Standard) would solve economic problems. This is nonsense.
Having control over supply of your currency is a good thing, as long as it's well run.
See here
Remember that what is desirable is low variance in the value, not the value itself. When there are wild fluctuations in value, it's hard for money to do its job well.
Since the 1970s, the USD has been a fiat money with no intrinsic value. This means we control the supply of money.
Let's look at a classic poorly drawn econ101 graph
The market price for USD is where supply meets demand. The problem with a currency based on an item whose supply is fixed is that the price will necessarily fluctuate in response to changes in demand.
Imagine, if you will, that a pandemic strikes and that the demand for currency takes a sharp drop. The US imports less, people don't buy anything anymore, etc. If you can't print money, you get deflation, which is worsens everything. On the other hand, if you can make the money printers go brrrr you can stabilize the price
Having your currency be based on a fixed supply isn't just bad because in/deflation is hard to control.
It's also a national security risk...
The story of the guy who crashed gold prices in North Africa
In the 1200s, Mansa Munsa, the emperor of the Mali, was rich and a devout Muslim and wanted everyone to know it. So he embarked on a pilgrimage to make it rain all the way to Mecca.
He in fact made it rain so hard he increased the overall supply of gold and unintentionally crashed gold prices in Cairo by 20%, wreaking an economic havoc in North Africa that lasted a decade.
This story is fun, the larger point that having your inflation be at the mercy of foreign nations is an undesirable attribute in any currency. The US likes to call some countries currency manipulators, but this problem would be serious under a gold standard.

Currencies are based on trust

Since the USD is based on nothing except the US government's word, how can we trust USD not to be mismanaged?
The answer is that you can probably trust the fed until political stooges get put in place. Currently, the US's central bank managing the USD, the Federal Reserve (the Fed for friends & family), has administrative authority. The fed can say "no" to dumb requests from the president.
People who have no idea what the fed does like to chant "audit the fed", but the fed is already one of the best audited US federal entities. The transcripts of all their meetings are out in the open. As is their balance sheet, what they plan to do and why. If the US should audit anything it's the Department of Defense which operates without any accounting at all.
It's easy to see when a central bank will go rogue: it's when political yes-men are elected to the board.
For example, before printing themselves into hyperinflation, the Venezuelan president appointed a sociologist who publicly stated “Inflation does not exist in real life” and instead is a made up capitalist lie. Note what happened mere months after his gaining control over the Venezuelan currency
This is a key policy. One paper I really like, Sargent (1984) "The end of 4 big inflations" states:
The essential measures that ended hyperinflation in each of Germany,Austria, Hungary, and Poland were, first, the creation of an independentcentral bank that was legally committed to refuse the government'sdemand or additional unsecured credit and, second, a simultaneousalteration in the fiscal policy regime.
In english: *hyperinflation stops when the central bank can say "no" to the government."
The US Fed, like other well good central banks, is run by a bunch of nerds. When it prints money, even as aggressively as it has it does so for good reasons. You can see why they started printing on March 15th as the COVID lockdowns started:
The Federal Reserve is prepared to use its full range of tools to support the flow of credit to households and businesses and thereby promote its maximum employment and price stability goals.
In english: We're going to keep printing and lowering rates until jobs are back and inflation is under control. If we print until the sun is blotted out, we'll print in the shade.

BTC is not gold

Gold is a good asset for doomsday-preppers. If society crashes, gold will still have value.
How do we know that?
Gold has held value throughout multiple historic catastrophes over thousands of years. It had value before and after the Bronze Age Collapse, the Fall of the Western Roman Empire and Gengis Khan being Gengis Khan.
Even if you erased humanity and started over, the new humans would still find gold to be economically valuable. When Europeans d̶i̶s̶c̶o̶v̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ c̶o̶n̶q̶u̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ g̶e̶n̶o̶c̶i̶d̶e̶d̶ went to America, they found gold to be an important item over there too. This is about equivalent to finding humans on Alpha-Centauri and learning that they think gold is a good store of value as well.
Some people are puzzled at this: we don't even use gold for much! But it has great properties:
First, gold is hard to fake and impossible to manufacture. This makes it good to ascertain payment.
Second, gold doesnt react to oxygen, so it doesn't rust or tarnish. So it keeps value over time unlike most other materials.
Last, gold is pretty. This might sound frivolous, and you may not like it, but jewelry has actual value to humans.
It's no coincidence if you look at a list of the wealthiest families, a large number of them trade in luxury goods.
To paraphrase Veblen humans have a profound desire to signal social status, for the same reason peacocks have unwieldy tails. Gold is a great way to achieve that.
On the other hand, BTC lacks all these attributes. Its value is largely based on common perception of value. There are a few fundamental drivers of demand:
Apart from these, it's hard to argue that BTC will retain value throughout some sort of economic catastrophe.

BTC is really risky

One last statement from Michael Saylor I take offense to is this:
“We feel pretty confident that Bitcoin is less risky than holding cash, less risky than holding gold,” MicroStrategy CEO said in an interview
"BTC is less risky than holding cash or gold long term" is nonsense. We saw before that BTC is more volatile on face value, and that as long as the Fed isn't run by spider monkeys stacked in a trench coat, the inflation is likely to be within reasonable bounds.
But on top of this, BTC has Abrupt downside risks that normal currencies don't. Let's imagine a few:

Blockchain solutions are fundamentally inefficient

Blockchain was a genius idea. I still marvel at the initial white paper which is a great mix of economics and computer science.
That said, blockchain solutions make large tradeoffs in design because they assume almost no trust between parties. This leads to intentionally wasteful designs on a massive scale.
The main problem is that all transactions have to be validated by expensive computational operations and double checked by multiple parties. This means waste:
Many design problems can be mitigated by various improvements over BTC, but it remains that a simple database always works better than a blockchain if you can trust the parties to the transaction.
submitted by VodkaHaze to badeconomics [link] [comments]

A complete list of everything our PMC has to do in Tarkov

Have you ever wondered the insane amount of suffering our PMC has to endure to complete every quest in the game and have the Hideout maxed out? Well, wonder no longer, because I've done the math.
Disclaimer: Long post ahead. I've used guides, data and analysis by other content creators, like Pestily, Europino and Questalace, as well as the all-mighty Tarkov Wiki to make this list. The resulting data should reflect the almost-perfect 100% Tarkov Speedrun starting with a Standard Account at the end of 12.7.
I don't know if this has been done before, so cut me some slack for any inconsistencies, as I did this for fun.

Killing:
The PMCs character arc will take our poor USECs and BEARs from battle-tested veterans to blood-thirsty killing machines the likes of Atila, with an indescribable amount of mental and physical trauma. This is all on the traders, who force us to commit genocide just to gain a standing with them. Here is the ranking:
This totals to a staggering 488 Scavs and 166 PMCs. 654 mothers will mourn the deaths of their sons, as you long surpass Simo Häyhä as the most effective soldier in recorded history.

Use, place, find in raid or deliver:
Apart from sustaining irreparable psychological damage as the bringer of so much death, your PMC is also expected to retrieve a back-breaking amount of loot for his Hideout and the 7 Traders of the Apocalypse. From life-saving devices to mere cigarettes, your PMC will have to.

Skills:
After all this Devil wears Prada reenactment, your PMC is faced with a Sisyphus-like destiny. You need to improve your skills until you get to Health level 9, Stress Resistance level 6, Sniper level 9, Memory level 8, Searching level 9, Charisma level 10, Vitality level 5, Endurance level 2, Attention level 3, Metabolism level 3 and Strength level 2. Some of this skills improve others, so let's start by the independent ones and asume you can completely avoid the deminishing returns mechanic.
And that's it. You want to escape Tarkov? Pay the toll!
Edit: Some pesky typos
Edit 2: Fixed the results of the Vitality skill, thanks to Erkeric for the correction
submitted by lady_barbuda to EscapefromTarkov [link] [comments]

I wonder what the price of Bitcoin would be if more people were content on owning a fraction of a Bitcoin.

I've heard of a number of situations where people are put off buying due to the high price of 1 Bitcoin. Just another example of human psychology hindering progress I suppose!
submitted by cosmic-cactus22 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin technology magazine with no price speculation or clickbait content

Bitcoin technology magazine with no price speculation or clickbait content submitted by use_your_imagination to BitcoinTechnology [link] [comments]

Bitcoin technology magazine with no price speculation or clickbait content

Bitcoin technology magazine with no price speculation or clickbait content submitted by HiIAMCaptainObvious to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

#bitcoin's price serves as content marketing to implant the mind virus. https://t.co/0gXr16SaBp - Crypto Insider Info - Whales's

Posted at: March 19, 2018 at 11:32AM
By:
#bitcoin's price serves as content marketing to implant the mind virus. https://t.co/0gXr16SaBp
Automate your Trading via Crypto Bot : http://ift.tt/2EU8PEX
Join Telegram Channel for FREE Crypto Bot: Crypto Signal
submitted by cryptotradingbot to cryptobots [link] [comments]

Bitcoin mentioned around Reddit: I had some Bitcoin back in 2011 that today would be millions but I sold it in 2012. I need advice. I'm content, but its funny, sometimes it hurts for me to hear about the price of Bitcoin. /r/Christianity

Bitcoin mentioned around Reddit: I had some Bitcoin back in 2011 that today would be millions but I sold it in 2012. I need advice. I'm content, but its funny, sometimes it hurts for me to hear about the price of Bitcoin. /Christianity submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

The Reddit Bake-Off, Reddit-wide tokenization, and where NANO fits in the future of digital exchange.

I first learned about Bitcoin from a person I met at an interview in late 2017. My primary interest was Bitcoin, but at the time I saw how much profit early Ethereum adopters yielded and I envied them for finding such a successful project in its early stages. My first investment in cryptocurrency was Litecoin. I was attracted to the fact that, although it was essentially the same as Bitcoin, it was faster and slightly less expensive. I dove in and I got rekt.
As time went on I began to do research on different coins. I found Binance and started exploring alts. I'd look at the Binance chart, pick a coin, Google it, read their whitepaper (since I didn't understand the code, eventually I just judged a whitepaper by its aesthetic), and ultimately I would end up on their subreddit. That's how I found CryptoCurrency.
At some point in my journey, a new wave of confidence entered the market. People started talking in the Daily about a new coin that appeared on some weird exchange whose named I had never heard. They said it was instant and free and that it was the absolute epitome of what Bitcoin was meant to be.
Countless users suggested this coin would absorb the entire market cap of Bitcoin.
Its name was strange, RaiBlocks (XRB). I had bought in around $20 at the time the price went from $0-38 in a couple of weeks. Everyone was enthusiastic about the bull run, but it was the technology and its potential for worldwide application that people were excited about most.
Welp, some bad press and a couple of years later and we are now in the depths of obscurity and any mention of NANO in the Daily on CryptoCurrency, the same sub that birthed its popularity in the first place, is chastised. I sadly watched as NANO lost its clout and with it its price. Eventually, BrainBlocks died, which was my favorite project of all, and I exited completely. I even removed NANO from my watchlists because I knew if I saw it I would buy back in.
NANO fell off my radar entirely for about 4 months while I dove head first into DeFi. However, last night I saw the charts looking favorable for a breakout, so I re-entered. Then today as Bitcoin pumped and every other alt dumped, NANO miraculously jumped. I figured the trading bots still oddly tie NANO to Bitcoin and after seeing NANO as the only successful coin in a sea of red, I came back. I also thought maybe the developers knew something we didn't, and the price was increasing before something big was about to happen, but that's just wishful thinking.
Right now, the most exciting corner of the cryptocurrency space is far and away the fact that Reddit is now heavily involved in the future of cryptocurrency integration:
  1. The Great Reddit Scaling Bake-Off is a competition hosted by Reddit to help scale Ethereum well enough to efficiently manage the complete tokenization of Reddit.
  2. As an experiment, Reddit has begun given tokens to posters/commenters at two subreddits for upvoted content: Moons and Bricks at CryptoCurrency and FortNiteBR, respectively.
A user was even able to bridge Moons and Bricks to equivalent tokens on the xDai Network (xMOON and xBRICK), and are literally tradable. For example, I earned 425 moons last month and I bridged them to xMOON and traded them for ETH on Honeyswap. I earned ERC-20 tokens from Reddit, bridged them to another network, and sold them. This, ladies and gentlemen, is not only the beginning of the tokenization of Reddit. This is going to be the beginning of tokenization of everything.
NANO is faster and feeless. An infinite number of blockchains can be created on the block lattice. A community member even generated a Moons to NANO converter, right?
My question is: Is it possible for NANO to bridge ERC-20 and ERC-677 tokens from the Ethereum network to NANO sidechain equivalents. Fore example, NANOETH, NANOLINK, etc.? Why can't NANO participate in the Bake-Off and develop a protocol that bridges NANO and other tokens via sidechains? Is it possible to create a token for every single subreddit and have them run simultaneosly the NANO network? Why isn't NANO in the discussion for this and why haven't we entered the Bake-Off? Is this not the best use case for NANO and the best place to implement the protocol?
To be quite honest, I am back because I think NANO will succeed in some way and I imagine the developers have a plan for marketing with the next hype wave in cryptocurrency. However, if that is not the case, then this project is missing a serious opportunity to become a part of perhaps the single most important incoming disruptor in the cryptocurrency space and economics, err, soon-to-be tokenomics of our society.
People once thought this coin would absorb the entire market cap of Bitcoin, but it's been 3 years and other projects have gained traction and now the spotlight is on Ethereum. Yes, there will never be another coin as fast or as free as NANO, but there needs to actually be use for it for it to become valuable and have a place in the future.
Thanks for reading!
tl;dr - Reddit is tokenizing all subreddits and is actively hosting a competition in order to try to find the solution to Ethereum scaling, called the Bake-Off. I want to know if it is possible for NANO to participate in the Reddit Bake-Off and use its protocol to tokenize Reddit.
submitted by fatal_music to nanocurrency [link] [comments]

PopChest Receives Overwhelming Response from Content Creators Seeking Micropayments | Inside Bitcoins | Bitcoin news | Price

PopChest Receives Overwhelming Response from Content Creators Seeking Micropayments | Inside Bitcoins | Bitcoin news | Price submitted by vlarocca to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Four Reasons Why I think Price will Continue to Rise in 2016, Plus New Content Coming to Bitcoin Futures Guide

Four Reasons Why I think Price will Continue to Rise in 2016, Plus New Content Coming to Bitcoin Futures Guide submitted by Bitcoin_Markets to btc [link] [comments]

WARNING: New to crypto? Feeling FOMO from Bitcoin going up? Be forewarned the halving is a classic "Sell the news" type event.

I don't normally post here but I've gotten texts and calls from people out of the woodwork that are interested in crypto all of a sudden due to the bitcoin halving. They are all feeling FOMO because price is going up and they want in.
Most noobs think "OMG THE PRICE IS GOING UP CAUSE OF THE HALVING... IT'S GOING TO KEEP GOING TO THE MOON!"
When in reality it's getting priced in RIGHT NOW and come the day of the halving (or a couple days before, basically this weekend), it may quite possibly stall out and fizzle out because by then it's already fully priced in. The halving is clear, public information. It is not some secret nobody knows about. You don't have any edge here.
We have had 8 green weeks in a row. The Bitcoin halving is in 4 days. This is a classic, obvious, clear "buy the rumor, sell-on-the-date-of-the-news" type event as fundamental events with a clear date attached are rare for BTC.
Also, everyone and their mother on twitter is posting about how Paul Tudor announced his fund is buying bitcoin. Listen guys, he prolly bought this shit at 4-6k and selling into your FOMO right fucking now. It's not a coincidence they published this shit 4 days before halving. I'm not giving financial advice. I'm not saying short this shit to the ground. I'm just warning newbies to not be surprised when come 1-3 days before the halving we get an insane blow off top followed by a subsequent bleed out or crash.
submitted by Antranik to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Bitcoin mentioned around Reddit: Netflix announces a price increase, and immediately pro-Netflix/Netflix-endearing content is posted and goes straight to the front page. Seems perfectly normal, carry on. /r/HailCorporate

Bitcoin mentioned around Reddit: Netflix announces a price increase, and immediately pro-Netflix/Netflix-endearing content is posted and goes straight to the front page. Seems perfectly normal, carry on. /HailCorporate submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

🔥Not your keys, not your coins : Why you should not use Paypal for Bitcoin

Today, PayPal announced that they will be launching a cryptocurrency digital wallet for buying, selling and storing Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin.
This confirms rumors which circulated earlier this year, and it is seen as a significant milestone by many in the community.
A milestone it may be, but it will impact millions of daily users who have, until now, never considered getting into cryptocurrency. For them, PayPal will be the leading authority in a space that it has long sought to discredit.
Over 221 Billion dollars were transacted in Q2 of 2020 using Paypal. That represents a rise of 10% in volume in just six months. PayPal is growing and dominating online payments as well as other services such as credit and insurance.
It has a long-established reputation of occasionally freezing user funds and censoring payments that conflict with its outlook but the payments giant continues to hold relevance where Bitcoin should have long overtaken it. Perhaps this news marks the beginning of a transition?
Is PayPal’s announcement good news for Bitcoin? Until very recently, PayPal was anti-crypto. Writing in 2018, ex-CEO Bill Harris called Bitcoin “the greatest scam ever”, so what’s changed?
This sudden turnaround is encouraging, especially as private companies like Microstrategy and Square make grandiose announcements about their own crypto diversification.
Should the community embrace them with open arms? After all, this is the start of mass adoption we’ve all been waiting for, right?
When a household brand like PayPal starts selling Bitcoin, it’s probably not because they want to spur healthy adoption. In the press release announcing their new cryptocurrency service, PayPal sends out mixed messages.
On one hand, the service will be entirely custodial, meaning users will not have the key to their own coins, while on the other they intend to “provide account holders with educational content to help them understand the cryptocurrency ecosystem”. The idea that anyone informed about bitcoin would agree to not holding their private keys might indicate that this educational content will overlook the fundamental rule of “Not your keys; not your coins”.
If millions of newcomers are onboarded to Bitcoin by PayPal, there could be a very serious information gap that jeopardizes their experience and undermines key principles of cryptocurrency.
This statement from their FAQ is, in practical terms, false: “You own the Cryptocurrency you buy on PayPal but will not be provided with a private key.” No-one should consider money held entirely by a third party as owned by them.
Time after time, exchanges have lost user funds, often leaving them with no recourse. A benefit for some will be a promise of greater regulation, where funds can be insured and new users may feel more comfortable than dealing with cryptocurrency exchanges directly, but they will be restricted from actually utilizing their coins. The only reasons to own Bitcoin which cannot be used, would be to invest for the long term, which is incredibly reckless to do when your funds are held by a third party, or speculate on its price, which again, would be introducing the masses to financial mechanisms they do not understand.
Is PayPal positioned to be a cryptocurrency leader? As it steps into the forefront, PayPal will be closely watched by companies, institutions, and consumers. While they can boast of “digital payments expertise”, they have historically taken an aggressive stance against users who bought cryptocurrency on exchanges, citing their acceptable use policy, forbidding transactions which “involve currency exchanges or check cashing businesses”.
The fact that this clause remains in their policy suggests that they intend to limit users to use only their platform for cryptocurrency, stifling competition and preventing users from ever withdrawing their cryptocurrency to the safety of a wallet they control the keys to. That said, there is something to be said for PayPal’s statement that they will “enable cryptocurrency as a funding source for digital commerce at its 26 million merchants”. Currently, the options for cryptocurrency funding are in their infancy, and Bitcoin loans could see future growth. There is only one thing about PayPal’s announcement that long-term hodlers will be celebrating today: the pump in price. Long-term, if PayPal proceeds without consulting the community and letting their users control their own keys, it offers no value to the space.
The greatest risk is that the clout they carry in traditional electronic payments will be interpreted as expertise in crypto. This would threaten the expert advice so carefully crafted by our community, which could be drowned out by the misinformed masses that PayPal brings to the space. For now, no-one can tell how it will turn out, but there are big concerns to address before informed users will turn to PayPal.
Welcome PayPal’s initiative with open arms, but by no means look to them for leadership. At best, this announcement indicates that they may fear sinking into irrelevance.
*Do not use PayPal for Bitcoin; there are many other places to buy crypto which will let you keep ownership of your coins. *
PayPal is conceding to Bitcoin, and the many other aspirational, educational projects within the community should be highlighted to prevent newcomers from falling into a trap of trusting one of Bitcoin’s greatest long-term adversaries.
Source : https://blog.trezor.io/why-you-should-not-use-paypal-for-bitcoin-f6e2d436ca96
submitted by mohiemen to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Bitcoin mentioned around Reddit: [ForHire] Web & Graphic Design, Hosting, Content Writing! (Paying Rent. 50% Off Prices) /r/HireaWriter

Bitcoin mentioned around Reddit: [ForHire] Web & Graphic Design, Hosting, Content Writing! (Paying Rent. 50% Off Prices) /HireaWriter submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Filmmakers Team With Programmers to Tackle Piracy and Content Accessibility Issues with Blockchain - Blockchain Agenda with Inside Bitcoins - News, Price, Events

Filmmakers Team With Programmers to Tackle Piracy and Content Accessibility Issues with Blockchain - Blockchain Agenda with Inside Bitcoins - News, Price, Events submitted by hetyj to TechnologyUpdates9 [link] [comments]

BITCOIN PRICE PLUMMETS IN MINUTES!  WHAT IS NEXT FOR BTC? BITCOIN PRICE CONTENT  Is It Pointless?  Crypto Bitcoin GIGANTIC Long Term Signal?! April 2020 Price Prediction & News Analysis Bitcoin Lower Low As BTC Price Falls Most Realistic Bitcoin Price Prediction for June 2020 ...

Bitcoin appears to lead the losses dropping by 3.83% trading at $10,470.15 at press time, according to CoinGecko. With Bitcoin (BTC) losing about 9.88% in the past month, expectations of a swift rise in price as well as the S&P 500 may meet with road bumps following the impact of President Trump’s health status. Image source: Shutterstock CME OI dictated Bitcoin’s price in August-September. During BTC’s last peak on August 17th, CME OI was at a high of $948 million. Right after, CME’s OI was down to $633 million during th1 end of August, but Bitcoin continued to hold a high position above $12,000. However, 2-days later, BTC faced its collapse below $10,000. CME’s depreciating OI possibly restricted BTC’s recovery and ... Bitcoin price recovers from the support at $10,400 but stalls marginally above $10,700. Consolidation is likely to take precedence based on IntoTheBlock's IOMAP model. Ethereum embraced support at ... Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC Slips Into “Buy The Dip” Zone By John Isige of FXStreet.com Wednesday, September 23, 2020 8:07 AM EDT Bitcoin recently encountered an expected resistance under $11,200 on the run-up to $12,000. A reversal ensued, initially finding support at $10,800. Attempts to recover the lost ground and close the week above $11,000 failed amid exhaustion in the bullish camp ... Bitcoin price (BTC) Add to Watchlist $ 13,070.01 +0.56%. 1h. 24h. 1w. 1m. 1y. all. $0.0000 January 1 12:00 AM. 10:56 AM 3:06 PM 7:17 PM 11:27 PM 3:38 AM 7:48 AM. Market cap $ 242.4B. Volume (24 hours) $ 23.6B. Circulating supply 18.5 M BTC. About Bitcoin. The world’s first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin is stored and exchanged securely on the internet through a digital ledger known as a blockchain ...

[index] [44321] [14956] [13569] [50970] [10515] [44554] [41448] [861] [44625] [22489]

BITCOIN PRICE PLUMMETS IN MINUTES! WHAT IS NEXT FOR BTC?

The content in this video and on this channel are only intended for entertainment purposes only! Bitcoin Analysis, Top bitcoin analysis, price prediction, Bitcoin Trading, Bitcoin 2018, Bitcoin ... Is a Bitcoin price of $1'200'000 possible in 2021? This is going to be the main question in todays episode together with some interesting news as far as adop... In this video, I talk about the bitcoin halving and a realistic price prediction for 2020. About every 4 years Bitcoin goes through something called a Bitcoin Halving. The Bitcoin reward cuts in ... Bitcoin price drops 15% in a matter of minutes. What does this mean for bitcoin bulls? Is btc even bullish anymore? Here is what you can look out for on the bitcoin charts. if you own bitcoin, you must do this immediately - tom lee uses it every day! His TOP SECRET ADVICE - Duration: 10:14. TechCashHouse - Best Bitcoin, Stock News 9,982 views

#